muihuong.vnScent keeps what you forget. Tiếng Việt

Learn · Part Two — Learning to resolve · Lesson 6 of 10

Odour threshold: why one part in ten thousand can drown out forty per cent

This is the most counter-intuitive thing about reading an analysis, and the place where most people draw the wrong conclusion.

On a chromatogram, the height of a peak tells you how much of a compound there is. It does not tell you how strongly you smell it.

The two diverge so far that they can reverse a conclusion entirely.

Detection threshold

Each compound has a minimum concentration below which the human nose cannot detect it. That figure differs between compounds by millions of times.

Geosmin — the smell of first rain — is detected at a few parts per trillion. Limonene needs concentrations many orders of magnitude higher.

The consequence: a sample containing 40% limonene and 0.0001% geosmin may smell more clearly of earth than of peel.

Three examples from this dictionary

1-Octen-3-one — the compound behind the metallic smell — has one of the lowest thresholds ever measured. It forms in tiny amounts on your skin and is still enough for you to notice at once.

2,4,6-Trichloroanisole ruins a whole bottle of wine at a few parts per trillion. No ordinary measurement catches it, but the drinker knows at once.

2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline is present in sticky rice in tiny amounts relative to the starch, and it still defines the whole smell of the pot.

The reading rule

The horizontal axis of a chromatogram can be trusted. The vertical one needs care.

Reading horizontally means reading the order of evaporation, and that order reflects your experience quite accurately.

Reading vertically means reading quantity, and quantity is not proportional to perception.

Why this matters when buying

It explains why two bottles with almost identical analyses can still smell clearly different: the difference lies in trace components that the analysis records at 0.1 per cent or not at all.

It also explains why blended goods are poorer than the real thing even when the data table looks equivalent. The blender adds the big peaks; the dozens of trace compounds nobody checks are not added.

The next lesson looks more closely at those trace compounds.

Further reading for this part

A shared list for the whole of Part Two — Learning to resolve, not a note for every sentence. We state what each source was used for.

  1. Ernest Guenther, 1948–1952. The Essential Oils Six volumes, still the foundation reference for classifying distillation methods. The three-way division we use — water, water and steam, direct steam — comes from here.
  2. International Organization for Standardization. The ISO standards for individual essential oils Each commercial essential oil has an ISO standard setting the ranges for its main components. It is the basis for every statement about a “normal range” in Part Two. The standards must be bought; they cannot be consulted for free.
  3. Robert Tisserand and Rodney Young, 2013. Essential Oil Safety The trade’s standard reference for dilution rates, photosensitisation and contraindications. The figures in this site’s Safety section follow it.

One thing must be said plainly. We have not read every work above in the original; most of the knowledge comes through secondary literature and reviews. We say so rather than let the list suggest a depth of research we have not reached.

Last updated: September 2026