muihuong.vnScent keeps what you forget. Tiếng Việt

Research · Volume 2. Odour, emotion and memory: a review of 119 studies · 9/10

Appendices C and D. Data-integrity log and glossary

Inconsistencies found during data extraction and how each was resolved, with a Vietnamese–English glossary of olfactory terms.

Data-inconsistency log

ItemInconsistency foundHandling in the report
Number of human OR genesEstimates of 391 [6], ~394/857 [9], ~400 [1, 8], ~350–400/~1,000 [33], ~700 in total [10], ~900 [1]Due to annotation definitions; ~400 functional / ~850–900 loci used
Number of human glomeruli1,100–1,200 [2] vs 8,000 [19]Corrected after checking Volume 4: histological counts (Maresh 2008: 5,568 ± 830; Meisami 1998: ~8,000 in young adults) give 5,000–8,000; the figure of 1,100–1,200 has no supporting count in humans
Bao 2019 [54]One review note describes it as a rodent studyIt is human fMRI (n = 25)
Hu 2020 [83], Rasch 2007 [80]: REMCI asymmetric around a positive point estimate (0.06 [−0.31; 0.18], midpoint −0.065; Rasch tapping 0.21 [−0.67; 0.25])Suspected missing minus sign; −0.06 used, flagged
Kehl 2024 [11] vs Dikeçligil 2024 [1][1] states there are no human olfactory single-cell recordings yetDifference in publication timing
Chrea 2009 [67]Degrees of freedom and Δχ² between models do not matchRMSEA/CFI fit indices used
Kohli 2016 [114]“8/13” studies in the main text vs 7/6 in the tableReported as per the table
Perl 2016 [109]K-complex CI inconsistent with t; numbers of men/women differ between sectionst and BF used
Krishna 2010 [118]Reported η² does not match the F/df ratioReported verbatim, flagged
Torske 2022 [4]Unpleasant odours: 293 foci in the text vs 229 in Table S1; hemisphere differsResults table used
Zelano 2016 [76]107 vs 112 participants; frequency bands differ between sectionsAnalysed n per group used
de Groot & Smeets 2017 [71]k and N differ between the abstract and the tableSingle N = 1,652 used
Szychowska 2025 [36]Units in Table 3 inconsistentPooled SMD estimate used
Moriceau & Sullivan 2006 [93]F(3,16) = 3.917 with p < 0.005 does not matchDirection of effect reported, p not used
Mujica-Parodi 2009 [73]Statistical threshold differs between original and replication analysesReported SVC results used
Iravani 2021 [65]p values in the text and figure do not matchCI and BF of the preregistered experiment used
Winston 2005 [62]; Krusemark 2013 [64]Typo “p < 0.5”Read as p < 0.05
Olfactory training [110–113]Participant/group numbers for Geißler, Damm and Altundag differ between reviewsPooled estimates used
TDI after OTDelgado-Lima 2024 g = 2.12 vs Sorokowska 2017 g = 1.10[111] used (full text read)
Bushdid 2014 [55]1.72 × 10¹² cited as a measurementIt is the upper bound of an extrapolation
Receptor antagonism [8]Pfister 2020 / Inagaki 2020 data are for mouse receptors (Olfr) at 300 µM, but are often cited as human dataSpecies and concentration stated explicitly in section 3.2 (found after Volume 3 was built)

Bilingual glossary

VietnameseEnglishShort definition
Thụ thể mùiOdorant receptor (OR)Class A GPCR; humans have ~400 functional genes out of ~850 (≈50% pseudogenes).
Mã tổ hợpCombinatorial codeOdour identity = the set of receptors activated; each concentration gives a different code.
Đối kháng thụ thểReceptor antagonism~50% of odorants inhibit ≥1 receptor in mixtures; synergy at low concentrations, antagonism at high concentrations.
Tắt đáp ứng / thích nghiTermination / adaptationTermination via NCKX4 extruding Ca²⁺ (established); the mechanism of paired-pulse adaptation remains unclear.
Cầu khứuGlomerulusConvergence unit in the olfactory bulb; roughly 5,000–8,000 per olfactory bulb in humans.
Hành khứuOlfactory bulb (OB)The only relay station before the cortex; already encodes valence at 50–325 ms.
Vỏ piriform trước / sauAnterior / posterior piriform (APC / PPC)APC: chemical structure, predictive templates; PPC: perceptual quality, categories, storage of odour fear memories.
Đối tượng mùiOdor objectA unified, learned representation of a complex odour; shows pattern completion/separation.
Mã hóa dự đoánPredictive codingTemplates of the expected odour appear in piriform/OFC before the odour arrives.
Hóa trịValence (pleasantness)The pleasant–unpleasant axis, ~30% of perceptual variance; can be shifted by labels, context and state.
Cường độIntensityEncoded in piriform; the amygdala tracks intensity only when the odour has valence.
Độ nổi bậtSalience|valence|; OFC area 11 generalises appetitive and aversive odours by salience.
Amygdala khứu giácOlfactory amygdala (MeA, CeA, ACo, PAC)Four nuclei receiving direct input from the olfactory bulb in humans.
Nhân nền-bên / trung tâm / giữaBLA / CeA / MeABLA acquires & consolidates fear; CeA autonomic output; MeA expression, evolved from the olfactory system.
Vỏ ổ mắt–tránOrbitofrontal cortex (OFC)Subjective, individual perception; modulated by labels and hunger/satiety state.
Vỏ cingulate trướcAnterior cingulate cortex (ACC)Dorsal ACC correlates with odour unpleasantness.
Vỏ entorhinal bênLateral entorhinal cortex (LEC)Olfactory–hippocampal interface; fan cells + dopamine form associations; an early site of damage in Alzheimer’s disease.
Hồi hải mãHippocampusOdour-as-known, context, first association, order.
Liên kết đầu tiênFirst association (primacy)The first odour–object association is prioritised by the hippocampus and predicts memory after 1 week.
Ký ức tự truyện do mùiOdor-evoked autobiographical memory (Proust phenomenon)Older, more emotional and less often rehearsed, but rarer than memories cued by words/pictures.
Khung LOVERLOVER frameworkLimbic, Old, Vivid, Emotional, Rare (Larsson 2014).
Tái kích hoạt trí nhớ có mục tiêuTargeted memory reactivation (TMR)Replaying odours during NREM sleep; g = 0.32 for odours.
Trí nhớ làm việc khứu giácOlfactory working memoryTheta encodes order, gamma–theta encodes identity; replay compressed 15–30×.
Điều kiện hóa sợ hãiFear conditioning (CS+/CS−)Pairing an odour with an aversive stimulus; forms quickly, extinguishes slowly, generalises to similar odours.
Tín hiệu hóa học xã hộiChemosignalBody odours carrying emotion; fear g = 0.36; processed below the threshold of awareness.
Khóa pha theo nhịp thởRespiratory entrainmentNasal breathing synchronises piriform–amygdala–hippocampus; lost with mouth breathing.
Thích nghi hành viHabituationOdour-linked emotion fades after ~20 minutes of continuous exposure.
Huấn luyện khứu giácOlfactory training (OT)4 odours × 2 times/day × ≥12 weeks; TDI g = 1.10, threshold only 0.34.
Thang Sniffin' SticksThreshold–Discrimination–Identification (TDI)Each subtest 1–16, total 48.
UPSITUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test40 scratch-and-sniff odours; predicts cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease.
SilexanStandardized oral lavender oilOral capsule standardised for linalool/linalyl acetate; the efficacy is that of the oral dose.
Hiệu ứng kỳ vọng / nhãnExpectancy / labeling effectLabels change pleasantness and mOFC activation for the same odour.
Bản đồ mùi chínhPrincipal Odor Map (POM)A 256-dimensional GNN embedding that predicts odour descriptors of new molecules.
Mã dạng lướiGrid-like codeSix-fold representation of a 2D odour space in vmPFC, APC and entorhinal cortex.
Mù thay đổi khứu giácOlfactory change blindnessBackground odours go almost unnoticed; subthreshold odours still change behaviour.
Nguy cơ sai lệchRisk of bias (RoB)Cochrane quality assessment of RCTs; odours can never be fully blinded.

Scientific reference material, not medical advice. Figures are redrawn from published data, not copied from the original figures. GRADE and risk-of-bias ratings are the compilers’ own. Every number traces back to detailed reading notes on each paper.